There are currently 402 studies in the GENERA database.

Advanced Search

General Information

Document type
  • Peer-reviewed journal article
GE organism
  • beet, maize, oilseed rape
GE trait
  • herbicide tolerance
Country
  • UK

Results

Efficacy
  • mixed

Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.

Hawes, C; Haughton, AJ; Osborne, JL; Roy, DB; Clark, SJ; Perry, JN; Rothery, P; Bohan, DA; Brooks, DR; Champion, GT; Dewar, AM; Heard, MS; Woiwod, IP; Daniels, RE; Young, MW; Parish, AM; Scott, RJ; Firbank, LG; Squire, GR
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.. 2003 November. 358(1439):1819-1832

Link to full text (journal may charge for access)

PMID: 14561316 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1402 ISSN: 1471-2970

Abstract

We compared the seedbanks, seed rains, plant densities and biomasses of weeds under two contrasting systems of management in beet, maize and spring oilseed rape. Weed seedbank and plant density were measured at the same locations in two subsequent seasons. About 60 fields were sown with each crop. Each field was split, one half being sown with a conventional variety managed according to the farmer's normal practice, the other half being sown with a genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) variety, with weeds controlled by a broad-spectrum herbicide. In beet and rape, plant densities shortly after sowing were higher in the GMHT treatment. Following weed control in conventional beet, plant densities were approximately one-fifth of those in GMHT beet. In both beet and rape, this effect was reversed after the first application of broad-spectrum herbicide, so that late-season plant densities were lower in the GMHT treatments. Biomass and seed rain in GMHT crops were between one-third and one-sixth of those in conventional treatments. The effects of differing weed-seed returns in these two crops persisted in the seedbank: densities following the GMHT treatment were about 20% lower than those following the conventional treatment. The effect of growing maize was quite different. Weed density was higher throughout the season in the GMHT treatment. Late-season biomass was 82% higher and seed rain was 87% higher than in the conventional treatment. The difference was not subsequently detectable in the seedbank because the total seed return was low after both treatments. In all three crops, weed diversity was little affected by the treatment, except for transient effects immediately following herbicide application.

Keywords

arable weeds, Britain, genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops, Farm Scale Evaluations

Funding

Funding source
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  • Scottish Executive
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Funding country
  • UK
Funding type
  • government

Links to outside analysis of this resource

Please contact us if you know of an independent summary or analysis of this resource.

Cite this study

MLA

Hawes, C, AJ Haughton, JL Osborne, DB Roy, SJ Clark, JN Perry, P Rothery, DA Bohan, DR Brooks, GT Champion, AM Dewar, MS Heard, IP Woiwod, RE Daniels, MW Young, AM Parish, RJ Scott, LG Firbank, GR Squire. "Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.." Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358.1439 (2003): 1819-1832. Web. 25 Jul. 2017.

APA

Hawes, C., Haughton, AJ., Osborne, JL., Roy, DB., Clark, SJ., Perry, JN., Rothery, P., Bohan, DA., Brooks, DR., Champion, GT., Dewar, AM., Heard, MS., Woiwod, IP., Daniels, RE., Young, MW., Parish, AM., Scott, RJ., Firbank, LG., & Squire, GR. (2003). Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 358(1439), 1819-1832. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1402

Please verify citations before use, citations are automatically generated based on information stored within the GENERA database and therefore may or may not be correct.